The Illawarra Building Manager’s Definitive Guide to AS 2118 Fire Sprinkler System Compliance and Maintenance

For Building Managers in the Illawarra region, overseeing a building’s fire sprinkler system is a fundamental responsibility with profound implications for life safety, asset protection, and legal compliance. An automatic fire sprinkler system, designed and installed to the specifications of Australian Standard AS 2118, is the primary active fire protection measure in most commercial, industrial, and multi-storey residential buildings. However, its effectiveness is entirely dependent on a rigorous, ongoing program of inspection, testing, and maintenance. This report provides a comprehensive guide to navigating the complex regulatory landscape and implementing a practical, compliant maintenance strategy.

The central thesis of this report is that fire safety compliance is not a passive, annual task but an active, continuous management process. It requires a nuanced understanding of a hierarchy of regulations, from the National Construction Code (NCC) down to the specific administrative requirements of local Illawarra councils. Adherence to Australian Standards—primarily AS 2118 for design and installation, and the critically important AS 1851 for routine maintenance—is not merely best practice but a legal mandate in New South Wales. Failure to comply carries severe consequences, including substantial financial penalties, invalidation of insurance policies, and, most critically, an unacceptable risk to human life. This guide will equip the Illawarra Building Manager with the knowledge and tools necessary to manage these responsibilities proactively, ensuring their building’s sprinkler system remains a reliable guardian against fire.

Section 1: The Regulatory Landscape: Your Fire Safety Obligations in the Illawarra

A building manager’s responsibility for fire sprinkler systems is governed by a multi-layered legal and technical framework. Understanding this hierarchy is the first step toward ensuring robust compliance and mitigating risk. This framework establishes not only the technical requirements for the system itself but also the legal obligations for its ongoing maintenance and certification, with specific administrative procedures enforced at the local council level in Wollongong, Shellharbour, and Kiama.

1.1. The Hierarchy of Compliance: From National Code to Local Council

The fire safety regulations in NSW operate as a cohesive system, where national codes set the high-level requirements, Australian Standards provide the detailed technical specifications, and state and local authorities enforce compliance.

National Construction Code (NCC)

At the apex of this structure is the National Construction Code (NCC), which serves as Australia’s primary regulatory instrument for building safety.¹ The NCC mandate when an automatic fire sprinkler system is required. These requirements are based on factors such as building classification (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial), height, and occupancy type.¹ For example, the NCC requires sprinkler systems in all buildings with a Class 2 or 3 part (residential apartments, hotels) that have a rise in storeys of four or more, and in all such buildings with an effective height over 25 metres.³ The NCC functions by “calling up” specific Australian Standards, which then provide the mandatory technical details for how to comply.²

Australian Standard AS 2118 – The “Rulebook” for Design & Installation

AS 2118, titled Automatic fire sprinkler systems, is the foundational standard governing the design, installation, and commissioning of these systems in Australia.⁶ It is the comprehensive “rulebook” that ensures a system is correctly designed and installed to be effective in an emergency.⁵ The standard is meticulous in its detail, covering every critical aspect, including:

• Water Supply: Mandating a dependable and robust water source capable of delivering the required flow and pressure to every sprinkler head.⁵
• System Design: Covering hydraulic calculations, hazard classification (e.g., Light Hazard, Ordinary Hazard, Extra Hazard), and component specifications.⁹
• Component Selection and Placement: Dictating the types of sprinklers suitable for different environments and the precise spacing requirements to ensure adequate coverage of the protected area.⁵
• Pipework and Fittings: Specifying approved materials and installation practices to ensure the system remains robust and leak-free.⁷

The AS 2118 series is divided into several parts to address different building types and system configurations, such as AS 2118.1 for general systems, AS 2118.4 for residential buildings, and AS 2118.6 for combined sprinkler and hydrant systems.¹

Australian Standard AS 1851 – The Mandate for Maintenance

While AS 2118 ensures a system is fit for purpose at installation, AS 1851, Routine service of fire protection systems and equipment, dictates how that system must be maintained throughout its operational life.¹³ A system designed perfectly to AS 2118 is not compliant if it is not maintained according to AS 1851.⁷ This standard is often referred to as the “Bible for the Fire Services Industry” and provides prescriptive procedures for inspection, testing, preventative maintenance, and record-keeping.¹⁶

Crucially for building managers in NSW, compliance with AS 1851 is becoming a direct legislative requirement. The NSW Government has mandated that from early 2026, all essential fire safety measures must be maintained in accordance with AS 1851-2012.¹⁷ This change elevates the standard from industry best practice to a statutory duty.

NSW Legislation – The Enforcement Framework

The Environmental Planning and Assessment (EP&A) Regulation 2021 is the key piece of NSW legislation that gives legal force to the NCC and the associated Australian Standards.¹⁷ This regulation establishes the formal compliance mechanisms, including the requirement for building owners to submit an Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS).²¹ Fire and Rescue NSW (FRNSW) plays a vital role in this framework, not only as the emergency response agency but also by conducting research that informs building codes, reviewing fire safety designs, and enforcing compliance where necessary.³

1.2. The Consequences of Non-Compliance: A Risk Management Perspective

Failing to adhere to this regulatory framework exposes building owners and their managers to a cascade of severe risks that extend far beyond a simple notice of violation. The consequences are legal, financial, and, most importantly, life-threatening.

A seemingly minor lapse, such as failing to conduct a mandated monthly inspection under AS 1851, can trigger a disastrous chain reaction. That missed inspection could fail to identify a critical defect, such as a closed valve or low water pressure.¹³ Without rectification, an Accredited Practitioner (Fire Safety) cannot legally endorse the Annual Fire Safety Statement.²¹ The failure to then submit a valid AFSS to the local council is a direct breach of the EP&A Regulation, resulting in automatic fines.²¹ Should a fire occur, the existence of a known, unrectified defect and a lapsed AFSS provides an insurer with clear grounds to deny a claim, shifting the entire financial burden of the loss onto the owner.¹⁵ This demonstrates how a simple operational failure can directly lead to catastrophic legal and financial liability.

The key areas of risk include:

• Legal and Financial Penalties: Local councils and state authorities can issue significant fines for non-compliance, such as failing to maintain essential fire safety measures or submitting an AFSS late.¹⁵ In cases of negligence leading to injury or death, building owners can face prosecution.¹⁵ Authorities also have the power to issue building closure orders until compliance is achieved.¹⁵
• Insurance Invalidation: Insurance policies for commercial properties invariably contain clauses requiring the owner to maintain the premises and all safety equipment in accordance with regulations. In the event of a fire, a non-compliant sprinkler system, particularly one with poor or missing maintenance records, can be grounds for the insurer to deny the claim entirely.¹⁵ One documented case resulted in $1.5 million in damages with the claim denied due to incomplete maintenance records.¹⁵
• Life Safety and Asset Protection: The primary purpose of a sprinkler system is to control or suppress a fire in its early stages, providing crucial time for occupants to evacuate safely and limiting the spread of fire.⁷ Compliant systems are proven to reduce fire-related fatalities by over 80%.¹⁵ Non-compliance fundamentally undermines this protection, betraying the duty of care owed to every person in the building.
• Reputational Damage: A fire incident, particularly one where safety systems are found to be non-compliant, can cause irreparable damage to a building’s reputation, leading to loss of tenants, difficulty attracting new ones, and a significant reduction in property value.¹⁵

Furthermore, building managers of older properties must not fall victim to the “grandfathering” myth. While an older system may have been installed to a previous version of AS 2118, the legal requirement to maintain it falls under the current, mandated version of AS 1851.¹⁷ Any modifications or extensions to that older system must comply with the current AS 2118.⁹ Moreover, local councils have the authority to issue Fire Safety Orders that can compel an owner to upgrade an older building’s systems to meet modern standards if a risk is identified, effectively nullifying any notion of being “grandfathered in”.²⁶

1.3. Local Focus: Illawarra Council Requirements (Wollongong, Shellharbour, Kiama)

The final link in the compliance chain is the local council, which serves as the primary administrative body for fire safety certification in the Illawarra. The key instruments of this process are the Fire Safety Schedule and the Annual Fire Safety Statement.

• The Fire Safety Schedule: This is a building-specific document issued with the original construction or development consent. It lists every essential fire safety measure installed in the building (e.g., sprinkler system, fire alarms, exit lighting) and specifies the minimum standard of performance for each measure.²⁰ This schedule is the definitive checklist for the building’s fire safety compliance.
• The Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS): This is the formal document that the building owner must submit to their local council and FRNSW every 12 months. The AFSS certifies that an accredited practitioner has assessed every measure listed on the Fire Safety Schedule and has confirmed that they are performing to the required standard.²¹ Submitting the AFSS is a mandatory legal obligation.²¹

While the requirement for an AFSS is statewide, the administrative fees and specific submission processes are managed by each local council. For Building Managers in the Illawarra, this means adhering to the distinct requirements of Wollongong, Shellharbour, or Kiama councils.

Section 2: The AS 1851 Maintenance Framework: A Practical Guide

AS 1851 provides a structured and systematic framework for the routine service of fire sprinkler systems. For a Building Manager, understanding this framework is essential for effectively overseeing maintenance contractors and ensuring that the service provided is truly compliant. The standard is built upon four core activities, benchmarked against the system’s original design data, and performed according to a strict schedule.

2.1. The Four Pillars of Maintenance

AS 1851 defines four distinct types of service activities, each with a specific purpose in verifying the system’s readiness.¹⁶

• Inspection: This involves visual checks to confirm the system’s physical condition and correct configuration. It is a non-destructive examination to verify that components are free from damage, accessible, unobstructed, and that settings (like valve positions) are correct. For example, inspecting sprinkler heads for paint or corrosion, or checking that pressure gauges are in the normal operating range.¹³
• Testing: This is a functional check to ensure that system components and the system as a whole operate as designed when called upon. This goes beyond visual checks and involves activating parts of the system, such as simulating water flow to test a flow switch or running a fire pump to verify it starts and delivers the required pressure.¹³
• Preventative Maintenance: This includes a series of proactive actions performed at predetermined intervals to minimize the likelihood of breakdown. It involves tasks like cleaning, lubrication, adjustment, and the scheduled replacement of components known to degrade over time, such as valve gaskets and seals.¹⁶
• Survey: This is a holistic visual inspection of the protected area to identify any changes in the building, its use, or its environment that could compromise the effectiveness of the sprinkler system.³⁵ This activity is crucial because a sprinkler system that is mechanically perfect can still be rendered ineffective by environmental changes.

Effective maintenance is not merely a mechanical check of the hardware; it requires a forensic analysis of the building’s ongoing evolution. The “Survey” pillar of AS 1851 is particularly important in this regard. A building is a dynamic environment; tenants may erect new partition walls, storage heights in a warehouse may increase, or new equipment may be installed. Any of these changes can obstruct sprinkler heads, invalidate the original hydraulic calculations, or change the fire hazard classification of an area, rendering the system non-compliant and ineffective.²⁷ The maintenance provider must be directed to look for these changes, and the Building Manager has a responsibility to manage tenant fit-outs and building alterations with the fire system’s design integrity in mind. 

2.2. Baseline Data: The System’s “Birth Certificate”

A cornerstone of AS 1851 is the concept of “baseline data”.¹⁶ This refers to the collection of documents and information that defines the system’s original approved design and commissioning performance. It is the system’s “birth certificate” and includes as-installed drawings, hydraulic calculations, component specifications, and the results of the initial commissioning tests.¹³

The importance of baseline data cannot be overstated. All subsequent maintenance testing is designed to verify that the system can still perform to this original, approved standard. Without this data, a technician can confirm that a pump runs or water flows, but they cannot confirm if the pressure and flow rate meet the specific requirements for which the system was designed.¹⁶ A Building Manager must ensure this data is securely retained and made available to the maintenance contractor, as it is the definitive benchmark for compliance.

2.3. The Rhythm of Compliance: Service Frequencies and Tolerances

AS 1851 establishes a precise “rhythm” of routine service activities, with tasks scheduled at intervals ranging from weekly to every 30 years.¹⁶ To provide practical flexibility in scheduling, the standard also specifies “tolerances” for each frequency. A tolerance is the permissible time window (e.g., ±5 working days for a monthly task) within which the activity can be completed and still be considered on time and compliant.³⁹ Understanding these frequencies and tolerances is essential for planning, budgeting, and managing service contracts.

Section 3: The Comprehensive Sprinkler System Maintenance Checklist

This section provides detailed checklists for the routine service of automatic fire sprinkler systems, translating the requirements of AS 1851 and associated best practices into actionable tasks. These checklists serve as a practical guide for Building Managers to understand the scope of work that should be performed by their qualified service provider at each interval.

3.1. Weekly Inspection Checklist (Primarily for Dry, Pre-Action, and Deluge Systems)

3.2. Monthly Inspection Checklist

3.3. Quarterly Inspection & Testing Checklist

3.4. Six-Monthly Inspection & Testing Checklist

While less commonly detailed in general literature, AS 1851 schedules specific tasks at this interval. These typically involve more in-depth checks than quarterly tests but are less intensive than the annual service. Tasks often include functional tests of pressure-reducing valves and specific checks on fire pump components as detailed within the standard’s service tables.¹⁶

3.5. Annual Inspection & Testing Checklist 

3.6. Five-Yearly Servicing & Overhaul

The five-yearly service is a significant milestone that involves a major overhaul of critical system components, not just inspection and testing. This service represents a substantial but necessary investment in the long-term reliability of the system.

• Valve Overhaul: All alarm, check, and hydrant landing valves must be overhauled. This involves draining the system and replacing all internal rubber components, including seats, gaskets, washers, and gland packing.⁴²
• Gauge Replacement/Calibration: All pressure gauges on the system must be either replaced with new, calibrated gauges or removed and tested for calibration by a licensed technician.⁴¹
• Hydrostatic Pressure Test: For systems with a fire brigade booster connection, a hydrostatic test must be performed. The system is pressurized to 1.5 times its normal working pressure to test the integrity of the pipework and the newly installed valve components, identifying any hidden leaks or weaknesses.⁴⁴
• Booster Flow Test: This test simulates a real firefighting operation. Water is pumped from the booster connection through the system to the most remote hydrant or test point to ensure the pipework is free of obstructions and can deliver the required water flow.⁹

3.7. Greater than Five-Yearly Servicing (10, 25, 30-Yearly)

These long-term service intervals address the aging of components that are not typically serviced.

• 10-Yearly: Requires the removal and laboratory testing of a representative sample of sprinkler heads from dry pipe systems.⁴⁴ It also often aligns with requirements for the internal inspection of water storage tanks, which may involve divers or robotic cameras.¹⁶
• 25-Yearly: This is a critical and often overlooked requirement for wet pipe systems. A representative sample of sprinkler heads (e.g., at least 14) must be removed from the system and sent to an approved laboratory for testing.⁴⁵ The tests verify the sprinkler’s release temperature and operational function. If a single sprinkler in the batch fails, a larger sample may be required, potentially leading to the replacement of all sprinklers of that type and age in the building.⁴⁶
• 30-Yearly: AS 1851 specifies further major overhaul and component replacement activities at the 30-year mark to ensure the continued viability of the system.¹⁶

The detailed nature of these checklists, particularly the major capital outlays required for 5-yearly and 25-yearly services, reveals a crucial point for building managers: compliance costs are not linear. While monthly and annual checks are predictable operational expenses, the major overhauls are significant, periodic capital expenditures. The mandating of AS 1851 in NSW means these are no longer discretionary upgrades but unavoidable legal requirements that must be factored into long-term budgets and sinking funds to avoid financial shock and non-compliance.¹⁹

Section 4: Defect Management and Documentation: Your Audit Trail

The process of fire sprinkler maintenance does not end when the technician completes the physical inspection. The subsequent steps—classifying and responding to any issues found, and meticulously documenting the entire process—are equally critical for ensuring safety and maintaining a legally defensible position. 

4.1. Classifying and Responding to Defects

AS 1851 provides a clear, three-tiered system for classifying any identified issues, which helps prioritize the response and rectification efforts.¹³

• Critical Defect: This is the most severe classification, defined as a defect that renders a fire protection system inoperative.¹³ It represents an immediate and significant risk to life and property. Examples include a closed and seized main stop valve, an inoperative fire pump, or a major impairment to the water supply.
  • Required Response: The service technician must notify the Building Manager or their representative of the critical defect before leaving the site. This verbal notification must be followed by written confirmation within 24 hours. The defect requires immediate rectification with minimum delay. Crucially, the building owner must implement interim fire safety measures (e.g., implementing a fire watch, providing additional extinguishers) until the system is restored to full operational capacity.¹³
• Non-Critical Defect: This is a fault or impairment that is unlikely to critically affect the overall operation of the system but requires correction to ensure its long-term reliability.¹³ Examples include a single faulty sprinkler head in a large system, a leak that does not affect system pressure, or a malfunctioning local alarm bell.
  • Required Response: The Building Manager must be notified in writing within one week. The defect should be rectified “as soon as practicable” to prevent it from escalating into a more serious issue.¹³
• Non-Conformance: This refers to a missing or incorrect feature that does not affect the system’s operation but is required to facilitate ongoing routine maintenance or meet regulatory requirements.¹³ Examples include missing or illegible signage, inaccessible valves, or the absence of required system block plans at the main valve assembly.
  • Required Response: Notification must occur within one week, and the non-conformance should be rectified “as soon as practicable”.¹³

4.2. The Golden Rule: If It’s Not Written Down, It Didn’t Happen

In the context of fire safety compliance, documentation is paramount. In the event of a fire, the building’s maintenance records will be subject to intense scrutiny by fire investigators, insurance assessors, and legal counsel. Meticulous, compliant documentation serves as the Building Manager’s primary legal shield, demonstrating due diligence and a proactive commitment to safety. Conversely, incomplete, inaccurate, or missing records can be interpreted as negligence, creating significant liability.¹⁵ The logbooks and service reports are the only objective proof that mandated maintenance has been performed. Without them, it is nearly impossible to defend against claims of non-compliance, which can have devastating consequences for legal liability and insurance coverage.¹⁵

Key documentation requirements under AS 1851 include:

• Logbooks and Service Records: All routine service activities must be recorded on-site at the time of the service. This is typically done using physical logbooks kept with the main system components or through the use of durable service tags and labels affixed to the equipment.¹⁹
• Content of Service Reports: A formal service report must be provided to the building owner. This report must contain specific information to be compliant, including the building’s name and address, date of service, identification of the system serviced, a detailed description of the activities performed, the results of all tests (pass/fail), and a clear record of any defects or non-conformances found, including their classification and location.¹³ The report must also include the name and signature of the service person and their company details.
• Record Retention: All service reports, logbooks, and related documentation must be retained on-site and be available for inspection by authorities, such as the local council or FRNSW. AS 1851 mandates that these records be kept for a minimum of 7 years.¹³

Section 5: Engaging Professionals: Your Fire Safety Partners in the Illawarra

Ensuring a sprinkler system is compliant requires a partnership with qualified and accredited professionals. The regulatory landscape in NSW has moved to formalize the qualifications required for individuals who assess and certify these life-saving systems. For a Building Manager, understanding these requirements is crucial for procuring compliant services and fulfilling their due diligence obligations.

5.1. The Accredited Practitioner (Fire Safety): Your Compliance Gatekeeper 

The NSW regulatory framework has replaced the vague historical term “properly qualified person” with the legally defined role of an Accredited Practitioner (Fire Safety), or APFS.²⁵ This individual is the compliance gatekeeper. Only an APFS can perform the final assessment of a fire safety measure and endorse the Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS) for submission to council.²¹

• The Fire Protection Accreditation Scheme (FPAS): To ensure a consistent standard of competency, the NSW Government has approved industry accreditation schemes. The primary scheme is the Fire Protection Accreditation Scheme (FPAS), which is administered by the Fire Protection Association Australia (FPAA).⁵⁰ An individual must hold accreditation under this scheme to be recognized as an APFS for the measures covered by the scheme.
• How to Verify Credentials: A Building Manager must not simply take a contractor’s word for their accreditation. The FPAA maintains a public online register of all accredited practitioners.⁵³ Before engaging a professional to sign an AFSS, a manager must:
  1. Visit the FPAA’s Fire Safety Assessment Register online.⁵³
  2. Search for the individual practitioner by name or accreditation number.
  3. Verify that their accreditation is current and has not expired.
  4. Crucially, check the specific fire safety measures they are accredited for. Accreditation is not a blanket approval; it is granted for specific measures (e.g., automatic fire suppression systems, fire detection systems, etc.).⁴⁸ The practitioner must be accredited forevery single measure listed on the building’s Fire Safety Schedule.
• Levels of Accreditation: For complex systems like sprinklers, there are different levels of accreditation. For example, Level 1 (Basic) accreditation may cover less complex systems, while Level 2 (Advanced) is required for systems with multiple pressure zones, combined sprinkler/hydrant systems, or high-hazard environments.⁵⁵ The Building Manager must ensure the chosen practitioner holds the appropriate level of accreditation for their specific building.

This creates a two-tiered professional structure that a Building Manager must navigate. The first tier is the service provider—the company whose technicians perform the hands-on maintenance. The second tier is the Accredited Practitioner—the specific individual who assesses the system’s performance and legally endorses the AFSS. While they may work for the same company, their roles and required credentials are distinct. The Building Manager’s due diligence involves verifying not only that the service company is reputable but also that the individual signing the AFSS holds the correct, current FPAS accreditation for all relevant fire safety measures.

5.2. Qualifications of Service Technicians

The technicians who perform the physical installation, inspection, and maintenance work are required to hold relevant trade qualifications. The primary qualification for a sprinkler fitter is a Certificate III in Fire Protection (such as CPC32813 or the newer CPC32820).⁵⁶ This is typically obtained through a multi-year apprenticeship and covers the core competencies of installing, testing, and maintaining various fire protection systems, including sprinklers, hydrants, and pumps.⁵⁷

5.3. Directory of Accredited Fire Protection Providers in the Illawarra

Sourcing local, qualified contractors is a key task for any Building Manager. Note: It remains the Building Manager’s responsibility to verify the specific and current accreditation of any individual practitioner engaged to endorse an AFSS.

Section 6: Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The effective management of a building’s automatic fire sprinkler system is a non-negotiable responsibility for any Building Manager in the Illawarra. It is a complex duty, underpinned by a strict regulatory framework and requiring diligent, proactive oversight. Compliance with AS 2118 and AS 1851 is not a matter of choice but a legal imperative that directly impacts life safety, asset value, and financial liability. The transition to mandatory maintenance under AS 1851 in NSW crystallizes this obligation, demanding a higher level of engagement and long-term planning from building owners and their representatives.

6.1. Summary of Key Responsibilities

The modern Building Manager must function as a knowledgeable risk manager in the fire safety domain. Their core duties can be summarized as:

• Understanding the Law: Possessing a working knowledge of the compliance hierarchy, from the NCC to local council AFSS submission requirements.
• Ensuring Compliant Maintenance: Scheduling and verifying that all routine service activities, from monthly inspections to major five-yearly overhauls, are performed in accordance with AS 1851.
• Managing Accredited Professionals: Conducting due diligence to select and engage service providers with qualified technicians and, critically, verifying the individual accreditation of the APFS who endorses the AFSS.
• Maintaining Meticulous Records: Ensuring that a complete, accurate, and compliant audit trail of all maintenance activities is created and securely retained on-site for at least seven years.
• Acting Decisively on Defects: Implementing a clear process for responding to and rectifying all identified defects according to their classification, including the immediate implementation of interim safety measures for critical issues.

6.2. Strategic Recommendations for Proactive Fire Safety Management

To move beyond a reactive, compliance-driven approach and adopt a truly proactive fire safety strategy, Building Managers in the Illawarra should consider implementing the following recommendations:

• Implement a Digital Compliance Calendar: Go beyond relying on contractor reminders. Create a master calendar for the building that tracks all AS 1851 maintenance due dates, including tolerances. Critically, this calendar must include the major 5-yearly, 10-yearly, and 25-yearly service milestones to ensure they are planned for well in advance.
• Develop a Long-Term Capital Expenditure Plan: Use the maintenance schedule as a financial planning tool. The significant costs associated with 5-yearly overhauls and 25-yearly sprinkler batch testing should be forecasted and incorporated into the building’s long-term budget or sinking fund. This prevents these mandatory expenses from becoming a financial crisis.
• Conduct Annual Contractor and Accreditation Reviews: As part of the annual AFSS process, perform a formal review of the fire service provider. This should include an assessment of their performance, the quality and timeliness of their documentation, and, most importantly, a fresh verification of the APFS’s accreditation status on the FPAA online register.
• Integrate Fire Safety into Tenant Management: Proactively manage the risks posed by building occupants. Include specific clauses in tenant lease agreements that prohibit the obstruction of sprinkler heads and require approval for any internal modifications that could affect sprinkler coverage. Conduct regular walk-throughs as part of the “Survey” process to enforce these rules.
• Foster a Culture of Safety: A Building Manager’s role can extend beyond technical compliance to that of a safety leader. This involves ensuring that clear, building-specific emergency evacuation plans and diagrams are in place and are regularly communicated to occupants. By championing a broader culture of safety awareness, the Building Manager reinforces the ultimate purpose of the sprinkler system: protecting the people within the building.

Stay Safe with Complete Fire Group

At Complete Fire Group, your safety is our top priority. Whether it’s ensuring compliance with Australian Standards or providing expert fire protection services, we’re here to support you every step of the way. Together, we can protect what matters most.

Need expert advice or assistance? Contact us today!
📞 (02) 42194542
📧 admin@completefiregroup.com.au
🌐 Illawarra: Complete Fire Group
🌐 Peakhurst: Complete Fire and Pumps

Thank you for trusting us with your fire protection needs.
– The Complete Fire Group Team 🔥